- Binance has been dethroned by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange as the largest Bitcoin futures market.
- This milestone is considered important in the race for a spot Bitcoin ETF.
Global derivatives marketplace, Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) has emerged as the new leader in Bitcoin futures open interest, surpassing the long-standing dominance of Binance.
This shift comes on the heels of Bitcoin’s remarkable surge past the $37,000 mark, a milestone not witnessed in over 18 months. This ‘flippening’ of Bitcoin futures open interest between CME and Binance underscores the evolving landscape of digital asset trading and the increasing influence of traditional financial institutions.
While Binance has been a crypto industry pioneer, the rise of CME indicates a broader acceptance of Bitcoin as a legitimate asset class. One of the possible reasons for CME’s success is that it operates in a highly regulated environment with strict compliance standards. This regulatory legitimacy appeals to institutional investors who may be wary of dealing with less regulated or offshore exchanges.
Understanding Bitcoin Futures Open Interests
To comprehend the magnitude of this shift, it’s essential to grasp the concept of open interest. In the realm of futures and options markets, open interest represents the total number of outstanding contracts at any given point. The metric is a reflection of the cumulative number of contracts held by traders, with the difference between long and short positions determining the overall open interest.
The news of CME overtaking Binance in Bitcoin futures open interest has prompted various analysts to weigh in on the implications.
Bloomberg Intelligence Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) research analyst James Seyffart, in response to a post by market analyst Will Clemente, raised a crucial question regarding the impact on the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) historical concerns about the depth and potential manipulation within Bitcoin markets.
The SEC’s hesitancy in approving spot Bitcoin ETF applications has been rooted in concerns about market depth and susceptibility to manipulation. Several prominent entities, including BlackRock Inc. and Fidelity Investments, faced setbacks as the SEC deemed their filings “inadequate” due to insufficient declarations regarding the markets influencing Bitcoin ETFs’ valuation.
CBOE’s Strategic Moves
The Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) refiled a submission for Bitcoin spot ETFs in July 2023, incorporating SEC feedback. Notably, CBOE intends to launch its Bitcoin ETF product following an expected surveillance-sharing agreement with Coinbase, a major U.S.-based Bitcoin spot trading platform.
The surveillance-sharing agreement, designed to address the SEC’s concerns, would provide CBOE with supplemental access to Bitcoin trading data on Coinbase. This strategic move aligns with CBOE’s commitment to enhancing its ability to detect, investigate, and deter fraud and market manipulation within the proposed Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust.
CBOE’s filing emphasizes that Coinbase represents approximately 50% of the U.S. dollar to Bitcoin’s daily trading volume, as indicated by Kaiko Research data in May 2023. This statistic becomes crucial in light of the SEC’s reservations about the depth and integrity of Bitcoin markets, particularly concerning ETF products.
Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone
- Invest in Binance and over 200+ cryptocurrencies on America’s most trusted crypto exchange.
- Buy Binance easily and with low fees via PayPal and credit card.
- Enjoy super-low trading fees and access to more than 400 trading pairs.
- Coinbase is regulated by the SEC and FINRA in the USA, and by CySEC and FCA in Europe.
100,000,000 Users
Crypto News Flash does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. Readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to cryptocurrencies. Crypto News Flash is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned.
Credit: Source link